Understanding inductive reasoning based on comparison, structure, and evaluation.
An analogical argument is a form of inductive reasoning that relies on the comparison of two or more things that are alike in certain respects. It assumes that because two things share some similarities, they are likely to share other similarities as well.
Unlike deductive arguments (Valid/Invalid), analogical arguments are evaluated as Strong or Weak.
Calling them deductive is incorrect. They reason from observed similarities to probable conclusions. Asked in Exam
Object A
Compare Similarities
Object B
"A" has characteristics of 'X" and 'Y". 'B' has characteristics of 'X" and 'Y". 'A' has the characteristics of 'Z'. Therefore 'B' has the characteristics of 'Z'.
MOTION : RUN :: EMOTION : FEELING
ExamWorse : Bad :: Doting : Fond
(Degree of intensity)
ExamFrown : Pain :: Smile : Joy
(Expression of emotion)
ExamCup : Coffee :: Bowl : Soup
(Container and content)
ExamNeurologist, Cardiologist, Alchemist, Gynaecologist
Answer: Alchemist (Others are medical doctors) Exam
Aravali Hills, Shivalik Hills, Nilgiri Hills
Logic: All hill ranges in India. Exam
Paper, Wool, Jute
Logic: Natural materials (trees, animals, plants). Exam
Tall, Huge, Thin
Logic: Physical dimensions. Exam
Eyes, Legs, Hands
Logic: Paired body parts. Exam
Are the shared similarities relevant to the conclusion?
Are there enough similarities?
Are there significant differences that undermine the comparison?